Emmco Insurance Co. v. Fox
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
This matter is on appeal by both parties, the court a quo having dismissed both the main and reconventional demands without giving reasons.
Plaintiffs arc the insurer and the insured, respectively, of an automobile which was damaged in a collision with.defendant’s automobile. Plaintiffs charge that defendant was guilty of various acts of negligence, to-wit, failing to keep a proper lookout; failing to have his car under control; cutting across from the right lane into plaintiff’s left lane; and driving while under the influence of liquor. Defendant denied all allegations and, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Babineaux v. SimsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Baumann v. Allstate Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Emmco Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canzoneri v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Alice v. WoodsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Chapman v. LalumiaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Dorsey v. Corrugated Asbestos Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962