Legal Opinion

Emmco Insurance Co. v. Fox

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1960No. 21431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

This matter is on appeal by both parties, the court a quo having dismissed both the main and reconventional demands without giving reasons.

Plaintiffs arc the insurer and the insured, respectively, of an automobile which was damaged in a collision with.defendant’s automobile. Plaintiffs charge that defendant was guilty of various acts of negligence, to-wit, failing to keep a proper lookout; failing to have his car under control; cutting across from the right lane into plaintiff’s left lane; and driving while under the influence of liquor. Defendant denied all allegations and, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Babineaux v. SimsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Baumann v. Allstate Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Emmco Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canzoneri v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Alice v. WoodsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Chapman v. LalumiaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Dorsey v. Corrugated Asbestos Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API