Legal Opinion

J.C. Compton Co. v. Brewster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 2002No. 97C-12191; A104352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

In this contract dispute between two businesses, defendant DK Investment Company, LLC, 1 appeals from adverse judgments for damages and attorney fees. Based on a special verdict form, the trial court concluded that defendant breached a contract that it had formed with plaintiff J.C. Compton Company (the breach of contract claim) and, alternatively, that plaintiff could reach defendant in its capacity as a member of a limited liability company that owed plaintiff money (the “piercing the veil” claim). The court entered judgment awarding plaintiff damages and attorney fees. We affirm the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wilkes v. ZurlindenOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ranger Insurance v. Globe Seed & Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Cortez v. Nacco Materials Handling Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. J.C. Compton Co. v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API