Legal Opinion

In Re Collier

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 2006No. A05-1178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of respondent’s motion for summary judgment based on its finding that appellant’s interest is junior to respondent’s interest. Appellant argues that, although he had actual knowledge of respondent’s unregistered interest in Torrens property, because respondent’s interest was not registered, it did not bind or affect the land and merely served as a private contract. Because respondent’s interest was unregistered, it was not an encumbrance, and appellant did not have actual notice of an interest in the land that was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API