Legal Opinion
Cauderlier & Associates, Inc. v. Zambrana
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 28, 2007No. Civil Action 05-1653(JMF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending before me is Motion of Cauderlier & Associates, Inc. for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). For the rea sons stated herein, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Cauderlier & Associates, Inc. (“CAI”) asks this court to rule, as a matter of law, that: (1) Sergio Zambrana’s counterclaims have been extinguished by the statute of limitations; (2) Zambrana has no ownership interest in CAI; and (3) Zam-brana has no right to an accounting or a monetary judgment from CAI.
STATEMENT OF…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buggs v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S.H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- S.H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Xereas v. HeissDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018