Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1937No. 32,896PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was a criminal prosecution for forgery. The first count charged the forging of a check and the second count the uttering of the same check. Defendant was acquitted on the former and convicted of the latter. He appeals and urges three grounds of error.

*243Appellant exchanged a check in the sum of $340 for two head of mules. Further facts will be narrated under the various contentions. His first contention is the trial court erred in refusing to give a requested instruction on the subject of forgery. While the forgery count is eliminated from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. State v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. State v. HundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. McCorgarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. State v. FoutsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. State v. OgdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. State v. GiddingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API