Legal Opinion

H. Landau & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1988No. 403-86CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action brought by a supplier to a government contractor based on representations made by government officials. Plaintiff, H. Landau & Co., alleges that the officials made representations that the agency involved, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) would guarantee payment to Landau, and that these actions either created an implied-in-fact contract, or now estop the defendant from denying a contractual obligation. Pending are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below the defendant’s motion is due to be granted.

I.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. California Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Chavez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  5. H. Landau & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API