H. Landau & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought by a supplier to a government contractor based on representations made by government officials. Plaintiff, H. Landau & Co., alleges that the officials made representations that the agency involved, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) would guarantee payment to Landau, and that these actions either created an implied-in-fact contract, or now estop the defendant from denying a contractual obligation. Pending are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below the defendant’s motion is due to be granted.
I.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- California Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Chavez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- H. Landau & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.