Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Martz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1947No. Appeal, 151PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

In this action of trespass plaintiff, as owner of a truck, recovered a verdict for damages to the truck as the result of a collision between the truck and an automobile owned and driven by the defendant.

At the time of the accident (July 4, 1943) the truck was being used in the business of plaintiff’s father, and driven by the father’s employee. Plaintiff alleged that he loaned the truck to his father for use in the latter’s business. Defendant filed no affidavit of defense.

On the argument of defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. defendant presented a defense which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Knoble Et Ux. v. RitterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Gnagey v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. McGlinchey v. SteigerwaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Education Resources Institute, Inc. v. ColeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Brunetto v. FerraraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Craft Engineering Co. v. MessaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Collins v. Parkton Compound Boiler Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Bossler v. WilsonPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API