Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1974No. 42928PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

— Query: Is a legal intern, certified under Admission to Practice Rule (APR) 9, employed in the office of a county prosecuting attorney, permitted to represent the State in a criminal proceeding from which lies a right of trial de novo on appeal?

We answer in the affirmative.

On March 6, 1972, defendant-respondent, Ms. Vina S. Cook, was charged in Renton District Court, King County, Washington, with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. She entered a plea of not guilty. The cause came on for trial July 11, 1972. A legal intern, engaged by the office of the King County…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. RidgleyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re the Salary of the Juvenile DirectorWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Graham v. Bar AssociationWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hagan & Van Camp, P.S. v. Kassler Escrow, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API