Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Adams v. Radcliffe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The sole question presented is the constitutionality of sec. 59.95 of the statutes, and it is unnecessary to recite the facts as alleged in the complaint further than to state that this controversy involves an attempt on the part of Vilas county to exercise the option in sec. 59.95, and to adopt the commission form of county government. The steps in this attempt were initiated February 20, 1933, and the election favoring the adoption of this form of government was held April 4, 1933. It is contended by relators that sec. 59.95, of the Wisconsin Statutes, as it stood prior to the enactment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Peck v. RiordanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. State ex rel. Busacker v. GrothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Scanlan v. ArchiboldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Grundt v. AbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. State ex rel. Melms v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sonneborn v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Milwaukee County v. BoosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Wolf v. Town of LisbonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Milwaukee County v. BoosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API