Title Office, Inc. v. Van Buren County Treasurer
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmolenski, J.
In this consolidated case, defendants appeal as of right from a circuit court order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition. Under MCR 7.215(T)(1), we are bound to follow the rule
established in Oakland Co Treasurer v Title Office, Inc, 245 Mich App 196; 627 NW2d 317 (2001), and therefore must affirm the circuit court’s order. However, if not for the effect of MCR 7.215(I)(1), we would reverse the circuit court’s order and remand for entry of summary disposition in favor of defendants. Therefore, we request that the chief judge of this Court convene a special panel to address this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Title Office, Inc. v. Van Buren County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Morris & Doherty, PC v. LockwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Green Oak Township v. MunzelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Detroit Free Press, Inc v. Family Independence AgencyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Simon Property Group, Inc. v. Taubman Centers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003