Legal Opinion

Albert J. Vitali v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 11, 1967No. 6926_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for knowingly possessing stolen goods that were stolen while moving in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 659. Defendant’s first complaint is to the court’s failure to allow his motion to suppress for insufficiency of the affidavit underlying the search warrant. We have reviewed the affidavit and consider the attack unsupportable. Where goods are of a common nature and not unique there is no obligation to show that the ones sought (here a substantial quantity of watch bands) necessarily are the ones stolen, but only to show circumstances…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  5. John T. Dirring v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. StephensOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. GillardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Rony MannCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Allan Michael KleinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Joseph GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API