Legal Opinion

Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Chavez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1990No. 12063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

The New Mexico Subsequent Injury Fund (Fund) appeals the workers’ compensation judge’s (judge) determination that the Fund is liable for 50% of payments made by employer to worker. The Fund raises several issues. It initially argues that employer had insufficient knowledge of any preexisting impairment to allow employer to recover, despite the late filing of the certificate of preexisting impairment. See Fierro v. Stanley’s Hardware, 104 N.M. 50, 716 P.2d 241 (1986) (where employer has actual knowledge of impairment before the subsequent injury, necessary certificate may…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Fierro v. Stanley's HardwareNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Barela v. Midcon of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hinton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  5. Denton v. Sunflower Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Country Wide Truck Service v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. John Driggs Corp. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API