Legal Opinion

Porter v. Vick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1994No. 94-0122PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

This mandamus proceeding arises out of a trial court order vacating the grant of a new trial. The Honorable Phillip Vick presided over the non-jury trial and rendered judgment for defendant Nicholas Hsu that plaintiff John W. Porter take nothing, and that the contingent third-party claim against Royce Coleman was therefore immaterial.

Porter and Coleman timely filed a motion for new trial. All parties received notice of the proposed hearing. On the hearing date, counsel for Hsu was detained at a court in another county. His office telephoned Judge Vick’s office and apparently obtained the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Fruehauf Corp. v. CarrilloTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hanks v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Commission of West HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re DickasonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re Baylor Medical Center at GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Watson v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Ferguson v. Globe-Texas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  5. Noell v. City of CarrolltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API