Legal Opinion

United States v. Lackey

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2003No. 02-1255PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Rodgerick Labon Lackey appeals his conviction after trial for possession of a firearm by a restricted person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). His sole issue on appeal concerns the denial of his motion to suppress the firearm. He argues that police officers discovered the firearm through an interrogation that violated Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). After Defendant’s arrest on a warrant, but prior to his receiving Miranda warnings, officers asked him whether he had any guns or sharp objects on him. He responded that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Dennis Dayton HoltCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Bruce Carneil Webster, A/K/A B-LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. DeJearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ramon Reyes, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. MacKrill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API