Burrell v. Way
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Two petitions to enforce liens on buildings and land under Pub. Sts. c. 191. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Bell, J., the jury returned a verdict for the petitioner in each case, and the respondents alleged exceptions. The material facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
These are two petitions to enforce liens on buildings and land, under the Pub. Sts. c. 191. In the Superior Court verdicts were returned for the petitioners, and the respondents alleged exceptions. So far as these are open and were insisted upon at the argument we proceed to consider them.
1. In his statement of lien filed in the registry of deeds on October 13, 1897, Burrell stated that he ceased to perform and furnish labor and materials on September 13,1897. His petition was filed in the Superior Court on December 13, 1897, and recited that he ceased to perform and furnish labor and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monaghan v. PutneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Miller v. WilkinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Borden v. MercerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Monaghan v. GoddardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Brosnan v. TrulsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Shaughnessy v. IsenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Vickery v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Scannell v. Hub Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc. v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.