Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Temple University
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 14, 1996No. Civ. A. 95-5141PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOHN, District Judge.
Currently before the court is defendant Lee Downing’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims against him. 1 Specifically, Downing argues that plaintiffs Title IX claim against him should be dismissed because Title IX does not provide for a cause of action against individuals. Defendant then asks that the court exercise its discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 and dismiss plaintiffs remaining state law claims against him. Plaintiff asserts that, in fact, Title IX does authorize causes of action against individuals, and, even if it does not, the state law…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Burrow Ex Rel. Burrow v. Postville Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Hewitt v. BS Transp. of Ill., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Smith v. Metropolitan School District Perry TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Hayut v. State University of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Niles v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.