Bohnen v. Metz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, J.:
The parties submit their controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and by their stipulated facts show that the plaintiff is a citizen of this State and the defendant city a municipal corporation, and the defendant Metz its officer charged with the duty of authorizing the payment of any moneys due or to become due on a contract with such municipality ; that a contract was made between the city and the defendant Wille for the erection of a municipal building for the sum of $30,000, in which building there were to be doors, windows and other manufactured…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People Ex Rel. Cossey v. . GroutNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ewen v. . Thompson-Starrett Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Callaway v. N. B. Downing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Ramaglia v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Pacific Manufacturing Co. v. LeavyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936