Legal Opinion

Trahan v. Trahan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1981No. C-106PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENTON, Justice.

Emma Trahan instituted this suit against her former husband, Jack Trahan, for partition of his Air Force retirement benefits, which had not been divided by property settlement in either of two previous divorces. The law in Texas has become well established that military retirement, benefits earned during marriage are property subject to division upon divorce. See, e. g., Taggart v. Taggart, 552 S.W.2d 422 (Tex.1977); Cearley v. Cearley, 544 S.W.2d 661 (Tex.1976). However, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in McCarty v. McCarty, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Busby v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Segrest v. SegrestTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ex Parte Hovermale, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  4. Southern v. Glenn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  5. Gordon v. Gordon, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API