Shatz v. Alexandria Gas Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Madison Circuit Court; John F. McClure, Judge. Action by Rudolph A. Shatz against the Alexandria Gas Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
A demurrer, for want of sufficient facts, to each of the three paragraphs of the appellant’s complaint was sustained, and the appellant has assigned errors by three specifications, each relating to a separate paragraph of the complaint.
There is failure on the part of the appellant to comply with clause five of rule twenty-two of this court. Manifestly such an assignment of errors contemplates an examination as to the sufficiency of each paragraph of the complaint separately considered as an attempted complete statement of a cause of action. In the short statement in the appellant’s brief…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Schwartz v. HolycrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Petzold v. McGregorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Judah v. F. H. Cheyne Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Brannan v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.