Legal Opinion

People v. Holly

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1983No. Docket 58429, 59282PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. E. Dodge, J.

Following a joint jury trial, codefendants were each found guilty of armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797. Defendants appeal as of right.

Defendants first argue that the trial court incorrectly denied their motion for separate trials. Generally, a defendant does not have a right to a separate trial; joinder is usually within the discretion of the trial court. MCL 768.5; MSA 28.1028; People v Hurst, 396 Mich 1; 238 NW2d 6 (1976). In fact, strong policy exists favoring joint trials and a defendant must make an affirmative showing that his substantial rights will be prejudiced before he is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. CarrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. People v. KelseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. SantanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. Von EverettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. FeldscherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API