People v. Holly
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtM. E. Dodge, J.
Following a joint jury trial, codefendants were each found guilty of armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797. Defendants appeal as of right.
Defendants first argue that the trial court incorrectly denied their motion for separate trials. Generally, a defendant does not have a right to a separate trial; joinder is usually within the discretion of the trial court. MCL 768.5; MSA 28.1028; People v Hurst, 396 Mich 1; 238 NW2d 6 (1976). In fact, strong policy exists favoring joint trials and a defendant must make an affirmative showing that his substantial rights will be prejudiced before he is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. CarrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. KelseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. GonzalesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. SantanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. Von EverettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. FeldscherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.