Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Crippen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial in the Court below, and defendants appealed from an order refusing to strike out the statement. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

The appellants moved for leave to add other portions of the record in the Court below to their transcript on appeal from an order of the District Court refusing to strike out plaintiffs’ statement on motion for new trial. The cause was regularly on the calendar, and regularly submitted for decision at the July term, on briefs to be filed in vacation, and the respondents’ brief was duly filed, after which, at the next term of the Court, this motion was made. At this stage of the case it would require a very strong showing to justify the Court in allowing the transcript…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barry v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calderwood v. PeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Genella v. RelyeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Quivey v. GambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Pendegast v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API