Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barry v. Lambert

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to dismiss the Appeal, as taken from an interlocutory order.

1ConcurrenceTerry, C. J.

*504The appeal, in the present case, is from an order denying the motion of the plaintiff to set aside the statement filed on the application for a new trial, and the proceedings had on such application, and also from an order allowing the defendants to amend their statement. The appeal was taken before the entry of final judgment. The orders were interlocutory, and no appeal lies from such orders, except in the cases provided by statute. They can only be reviewed on appeal from the final judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Meminger v. SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Ketchum v. CrippenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Meininger v. GluckaufCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Quivey v. GambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API