United States v. Gonzalez

Opinion of the Court

Contrary to his pleas, a special court-martial consisting, of a military judge alone found that, among other things, appellant had “wrongfully communicate[d] to Sergeant First Class Kenneth Hill, a threat to kill him.”1 Gonzalez questions whether the military judge erred in ruling that the defense at trial could not present certain extrinsic evidence of Sergeant Hill’s alleged bias. 15 M.J. 59 (1982). On the evidence in the record before us, appellant’s position is without merit.

*424SFC Hill had been a government witness at a prior court-martial of appellant for offenses…