Legal Opinion
Heyman v. Kline
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 19, 1970No. Civ. B-12PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS.
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Defendant’s motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (2), Fed.R.Civ.P., for lack of in personam jurisdiction over defendant in this diversity action presents the questions (1) whether defendant, a resident of Florida, is amenable to service of process in Florida under Connecticut’s longarm statute, Conn.P.A. No. 744 (Jan.1969), formerly Conn.Gen. Stat. § 52-59a (1958); and (2) whether service was properly made on defendant in Florida under Conn.P.A. No. 635 (Jan.1969), formerly Conn.Gen.Stat.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hitt v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
- Heyman v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970
- Sykes v. BealDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
- Heyman v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971