Lofgren v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENTS, Judge.
Jon Eric Lofgren (appellant) appeals his conviction for violating Code § 18.2-427, use of profane, threatening or indecent language over the telephone. 1 Appellant argues the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. For the reasons stated, we agree with appellant and reverse his conviction.
Background
‘When considering a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence on appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party at trial and consider all inferences fairly deducible from that evidence.” Jones v. Commonwealth, 276 Va. 121, 124, 661…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Court v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- United States v. William M. LandhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Jones v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- State v. HarroldNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rives v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Barson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Kimberly F. Neice v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Lisa Alexander v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013