Legal Opinion

Jesperson v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1931No. File No. 5871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBikdzell, J.

In July, 1928, the plaintiff ordered from the defendant a Eumely No. 3 combine harvester with a two-foot extension, a flax sieve, a straw dump and a pick-up attachment, for which he agreed to pay in cash $1,383.57. The order was in writing and was accepted in writing by the defendant company at La Porte, Indiana, on July 17th. The contract contained stipulations with reference to warranties and rescission identical with those referred to in Bratberg v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. ante, 452, — A.L.R. —, 238 N. W. 552, decided at this term. On the arrival of the machinery on or about August 3,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Learned v. HamburgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Fuller v. FriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bratberg v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Lamborn & Co. v. Green & GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gimbel v. KuntzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jackson v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API