Legal Opinion

Learned v. Hamburger

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1923PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The first count of the declaration in the first action is on an account annexed, for goods sold and delivered under contracts hereinafter described, while the second and thud counts are for breach of agreements by the defendants to buy twenty-one hundred cases of shoes, which have become immaterial by reason of the findings and rulings *468to which Learned did not except. A fourth count was subsequently allowed which followed substantially the findings, and may be considered with the first count as supporting the general findings. The answer is a general denial, with a claim that the sales were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Malting Co. v. Souther Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Fullam v. Wright & Colton Wire Cloth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Parker v. S. G. Shaghalian & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Weston v. BarnicoatMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Zarthar v. SalibaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Raymond Syndicate, Inc. v. American Radio & Research Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Lander v. Samuel Heller Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Poorvu v. WeisbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API