United States v. Abercrombie
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
W. Keith Watkins, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendant Daniel Leon Abercrombie was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. A breathalyzer said his blood contained 0.08 percent alcohol - the lowest amount that is illegal per se. But at trial, the government conceded that the breathalyzer has a margin of error. And according to the government's witness, Mr. Abercrombie's blood might have contained just 0.077 percent alcohol - an amount that would have required the jury to acquit him.
Knowing that Mr. Abercrombie was relying on a margin-of-error defense, the government introduced…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. HandsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ray v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020