Legal Opinion

United States v. Abercrombie

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 28, 2019No. CASE NO. 1:17-CR-442-WKWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

W. Keith Watkins, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant Daniel Leon Abercrombie was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. A breathalyzer said his blood contained 0.08 percent alcohol - the lowest amount that is illegal per se. But at trial, the government conceded that the breathalyzer has a margin of error. And according to the government's witness, Mr. Abercrombie's blood might have contained just 0.077 percent alcohol - an amount that would have required the jury to acquit him.

Knowing that Mr. Abercrombie was relying on a margin-of-error defense, the government introduced…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. HandsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ray v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API