Brooks v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice:
The appellant, James E. Brooks, has appealed from a sentence imposed in Superior Court after a jury verdict of guilty of grand larceny under T. 11 Del.C. § 631. He charges that his confession was improperly admitted into evidence because it was involuntary and was made without his having been informed of his rights to remain silent and to have counsel, as required by Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.
The defendant was first questioned but not arrested on August 9, 1966. The questioning was by Detective Collison, who testified that he first…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Webster v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. BurleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.