Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Veneman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 26, 2005No. 04-1379PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge... Arthur Harvey appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman on Harvey’s claims alleging that multiple provisions of the National Organic Program Final Rule (“Final Rule” or “Rule”), 7 C.F.R. Pt. 205, are inconsistent with the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6523 (“OFPA” or “Act”).
Harvey appeals on seven of the nine counts he originally brought. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment on the first, second, fifth, sixth, and eighth counts and reverse on the third and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Carcieri v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Harvey v. JohannsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Castaneda v. SouzaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Brown v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.