Legal Opinion

Zaruba v. Boethel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 26, 1965No. 107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NYE, Justice.

Appellant brought suit against appellee to recover money paid under an oral contract for the purchase of land. The court sustained appellee’s motion for summary judgment, entering judgment that appellant take nothing.

The question before us is whether the appellant’s cause of action is barred by the two-year statute of limitations under the law of summary judgment practice. We must determine when appellant’s cause of action arose to calculate the running of the two-year statute. In this situation we must determine whether any material issues of fact are in dispute as to the time…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Johnson v. PortwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Willoughby v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lacy v. Carson Manor Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Hall v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. L. L. McGuire v. John F. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Village Medical Center, Ltd. v. ApolzonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API