Legal Opinion

McArthur v. Blaisdell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1911No. L.A. No. 2033PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

An action was brought by Beauchamp H. Smith for an accounting and for certain specific property under an asserted copartnership. Judgment was given in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and this appeal is prosecuted from an order of the superior court denying said motion. After the appeal was taken the appellant died and William T. McArthur was duly appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased and was substituted as appellant.

The amended complaint which appears in the transcript bases the right to the relief demanded upon the alleged existence of a copartnership…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Scott v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Austin v. Harry E. Jones, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API