Cornell Pump Co. v. City of Bellingham
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
A trial court may require a party that wrongfully obtains a temporary restraining order to pay the costs and fees associated with dissolving the order. The purpose of this equitable rule is to discourage parties from unnecessarily seeking injunctive relief. This rule has a limited application in the public bidding context because a *229disappointed bidder cannot obtain any relief once the contract has been signed and cannot receive damages. Thus, in many public bidding cases, awarding attorney fees may not be appropriate. There is not, however, an absolute bar to attorney fees in the public…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cornell Pump Co. v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Skyline Contractors, Inc. v. Spokane Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Doyle v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Eric Burt v. Washington State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of ChristCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.