Legal Opinion
Concordia College Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1993No. 92-1307PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of W.R. Grace & Company; W.R. Grace & Company — Connecticut; Carey-Canada, Inc.; Basic, Inc.; Celotex Corporation; Keene Corporation; National Gypsum Company; Pfizer, Inc.; and United States Gypsum Company (collectively W.R. Grace1), all manufacturers of asbestos-containing building materials, on the claim of Concordia College Corporation for recovery of its abatement costs in removing asbestos from its buildings. We affirm.
Two Minnesota statutes are especially relevant here, and we begin by identifying them and their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Briehl v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- National Bank Of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Diocese of Winona v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.