Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Santini
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 2015No. 15-1147UnpublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
CAROLYN B. McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Gerald Lee Patterson appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his Bivens suit, which the district court administratively closed after the parties entered a conditional settlement. Because the collateral proceedings that motivated the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Mire v. Full Spectrum Lending Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Wendall NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Quinn v. CGRCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Archuleta v. Triad National Security LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Biglow v. Dell Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- Bishop v. Sierra Nevada CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Bryant v. McLeanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Caldera v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.