Legal Opinion

Renner v. Hanna

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1917No. 23,022Published

From Morgan Circuit Court; Nathan A. Whitaker, Judge. Action by- Emma S. Renner against Sarah C. Hanna and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.

Appellant was plaintiff and contestant of a probated will in the trial court. The trial resulted in a verdict and a judgment sustaining the will. Appellant describes the action as one to contest a will; and this is evidently the proper, theory of the complaint.

The plaintiff alleged all the statutory grounds for contesting the will, using the language of the statute for such purpose; and in addition thereto alleged that said will purported to dispose of all the testator’s property; that it purported to devise certain real estate to Sarah C. Hanna. The language of the. will in this respect is:

“I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ditton v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Clearspring Township v. BloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Summers v. CopelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wheeler v. LoeschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Schmidt v. BomersbachIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API