Legal Opinion

LONTEX CORPORATION v. NIKE, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2021No. 2:18-cv-05623Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LONTEX CORPORATION, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 18-5623 NIKE, INC. MEMORANDUM RE DAUBERT MOTIONS Baylson, J. March 25, 2021 I. Introduction Plaintiff Lontex Corporation (“Lontex”) and Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) are both companies which manufacture and sell athletic clothing. Lontex owns a trademark, “cool compression,” and asserts Nike is liable for infringement under the Lanham Act and state law claims. This case only concerns instances of Nike’s use of the phrase “cool compression.” Currently pending before the Court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Schneider v. FriedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API