Legal Opinion

Feine v. McGowan

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 22, 1949No. Civ. A. 1276Published

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Chief Judge.

While many material facts are not the same as in Kinkel v. McGowan, D.C., 97 F. Supp. 43 there are many which are and which need not be repeated in detail. Both suits arise out of the relations of both plaintiffs with March Gold, Inc., incorporated in Delaware, U. S. A., and March Gold, Ltd., a Canadian corporation, and also with Marbuan Gold Mines, Ltd., successor in interest to March Gold, Ltd.

This suit is brought for a refund of $1,153.33, taxes, and $205.06 interest, a total of $1,358.39, paid to the defendant as Collector of Internal Revenue under protest March 15,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Evans v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Mack v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Kinkel v. McGowanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API