Legal Opinion

Mack v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 7, 1942No. 242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The deficiency in dispute resulted from the disallowance by the commissioner of a deduction of $41,600 claimed in the taxpayer’s 1937 return as an ordinary loss, deductible under section 23 (e) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code § 23 (e) (1), in respect to 416 shares of preferred stock of William B. Nichols & Co. This corporation was engaged in the business of industrial management and engineering. Its income was derived principally from fees for such services. It was still in business at the time of the hearing before the Board. In the latter part…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Evans v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  4. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BurdickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  5. Peabody Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Downer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  2. Feine v. McGowan Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Downer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  4. Feine v. McGowanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1949
  5. Feine v. McGowan Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API