Legal Opinion
Waterstaat v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1969No. 4843-4845PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
Appellant was convicted by the court below sitting without a jury on informations charging him with attempted unauthorized use of a vehicle, 1 possession of a prohibited weapon (a stiletto knife), 2 and carrying a pistol without a license. 3 Appellant was sentenced to serve an indeterminate sentence under the provisions of the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b). He urges reversal of his convictions on the grounds that (1) the Government failed to prove at trial that the owner of the stolen automobile in which appellant was arrested had not given appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- United States v. Fiore John Luciano and William DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Robert Calhoun, Jr. v. United States of America, Calvin Fields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Logan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kenhan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.