Legal Opinion
Patrick v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 13, 2009No. 3:06-cr-01506PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 78] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 90]
JAN M. ADLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This ERISA case involves the issue of whether claims administrator Voluntary Plan Administrators, Inc. (“VPA”), acting on behalf of Defendants, abused its discretion in denying Plaintiffs claim for long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under the Hewlett-Packard Company Disability Plan (“the Plan”). On January 23, 2009, Plaintiff Lyn Patrick (“Patrick” or “Plaintiff’) and Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jack FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oster v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011