Legal Opinion
Oster v. Standard Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 5, 2011No. Case C 09-00851 SBAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
REDACTED
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Brent Oster (“Oster”) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., seeking long term disability benefits under the terms of Defendants’ long term disability plan. The parties are presently before the Court on cross-motions for judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. Dkts. 29, 66. After consideration of the parties’ briefs, the evidence in the Administrative Record, and the extrinsic evidence offered by Plaintiff on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- White v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Hart v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Harvey v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.