Legal Opinion

Smothers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1954No. 6 Div. 922PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

George Smothers, the appellant, was convicted of possessing an illegal whiskey still. Title 29, § 131, Code 1940.

The defendant did not testify in his own behalf, and in the main there is no dispute in the evidence.

The raiding officers found a complete whiskey distilling outfit near a river in a location they described as the “Orman Simpson bottom.”

Howard Frost was seen by the officers working at the still and was there arrested. He lived about one-half mile from the still site. He testified that the appellant employed him to operate the still and he was engaged in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. De Graaf v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Lynn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API