Bryant v. State

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted, charged with theft of an automobile and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The first two grounds in the motion for new trial read as follows: “1. The court erred in paragraph 1 of the charge in defining the offense of theft; (2) The court 'erred in refusing to give defendant’s special requested charge No. 1.” These grounds are too general to be considered on appeal. (Sue v. The State, 52 Texas Crim. Rep., 122; Stewart v. State, decided at this term of court, and authorities there cited.) If called to our attention…