Cecilia A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether the juvenile court violates a mentally impaired parent’s due process rights when it fails to suspend a parental severance hearing until the parent can regain the ability to meaningfully participate in the proceedings and assist counsel. In deciding this issue, we must also determine a guardian ad litem’s authority to act for a parent in severance proceedings. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 Three months after twenty-month-old A.G. was put in a voluntary foster-care placement, the Arizona Department of Economic…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State, in Interest of Ae and JdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Denise H. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State, in Interest of SadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Child Safety v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Aleise H. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Logan B. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Barton v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020