Legal Opinion
Camp v. Chase
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 7, 1983No. File 265481PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKline, J.
This is a shareholders’ derivative action brought in thirteen counts, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-572j, against various officers and directors of Connecticut Banc Federation, Inc. (ConFed), and Guaranty Bank and Trust Company (Guaranty). The plaintiff alleges that he brings each count “on behalf of himself and other shareholders of ConFed similarly situated to enforce the rights of Guaranty against Guaranty’s directors.”
It is undisputed that the plaintiff is an attorney licensed to practice law in Connecticut and has entered a pro se appearance in the present action. In addition,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- duPont v. WylyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Boucher Agency, Inc. v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Lamb v. United Security Life Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bolduc v. Durocher, No. 361993 (Mar. 6, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Dairy Fresh v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., No. 386770 (Feb. 18, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Smith v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993