Legal Opinion

Smith v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1993No. 91-CV-529Published

1Opinion of the Court

631 A.2d 387 (1993)

Carroll SMITH, Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Appellees.

No. 91-CV-529.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued May 28, 1992.

Decided September 16, 1993.

Vanessa M. Carpenter, with whom Jay M. Berkowitz, Adelphi, MD, was on the brief, for appellant.

Cynthia R. Mabry, Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Robert L. Polk, Gen. Counsel, Arnold I. Melnick, Deputy Gen. Counsel, and Gerard J. Stief, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellee WMATA.

Jonathan S. Resnick, Washington, DC, for appellee Restrepo.

Before FARRELL and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Dimond v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API