Legal Opinion

Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., Bnsf Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. City of Houston, Texas and Daniel Krueger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and Engineering

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2016No. 14-0459Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 14-0459 444444444444 HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY CO., BNSF RAILWAY CO., AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., PETITIONERS, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS AND DANIEL KRUEGER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Argued October 13, 2015 JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the Court. JUSTICE LEHRMANN filed a concurring…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Reata Construction Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API