Legal Opinion

O'MALLEY v. Cummings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 14, 1967No. Gen. 51,571PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

In an amended complaint the plaintiffs, Michael O’Malley and the Beverly Bank, as beneficiary and trustee respectively of a trust agreement, sought specific performance of a contract. By the contract the defendant, Nathan Cummings, had agreed to sell a parcel of improved real estate to the bank’s assignor, Harold Richter. Opposing motions for summary judgment were filed, that of the plaintiffs was granted, specific performance was decreed and the defendant appeals.

The contract was executed on May 1, 1965. The purchase price was $150,000 less $15,000 earnest money paid on that date. Cummings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horan v. BlowitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lang v. ParksIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brown v. JurczakIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Zempel v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Boardman v. BubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Elda Arnhold and Byzantio, L.L.C. v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. La Salle National Bank v. International LimitedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Mayfield v. KoroghliNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Janssen Bros. v. Northbrook Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API