Legal Opinion

Stetson v. Stetson

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1914Published

Divorce action by Catherine N. Stetson against Ralph W. Stetson. On application for interlocutory judgment. Application denied, with leave to make new application.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is an application for interlocutory judgment in an undefended action for a divorce. The evidence presented is, I think, wholly insufficient to warrant the court in granting judgment *246'for the plaintiff. The complaint charges the commission of statutory offenses in New York City in April and May, 1912, with a named corespondent, and also that afterward the defendant left New York, accompanied by the corespondent, and lived in adulterous intercourse with her until about July 1, 1912, when he was arrested upon a charge of violating the federal laws relating to “white slavery,” upon which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyon v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Fowler v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Timmann v. TimmannNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sigel v. SigelThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892
  5. Diederichs v. DiederichsNew York Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API